Transcript
WEBVTT
00:00:01.000 --> 00:00:05.959
Here's another great piece from Allyson and her writings over at the VC Minute Substack.
00:00:06.200 --> 00:00:12.429
And of course you can subscribe to get Allyson's biweekly newsletter at vcminute.substack.com.
00:00:13.429 --> 00:00:15.349
Investors place a high value on founders.
00:00:15.349 --> 00:00:25.489
Being able to communicate key elements of their business because so much of a startup success, including hiring early employees and selling comes down to the founder, being able to simply articulate the vision.
00:00:26.326 --> 00:00:27.106
Simplicity though.
00:00:27.106 --> 00:00:29.685
It was only part of the equation for a successful pitch.
00:00:30.015 --> 00:00:31.966
Another key component is specificity.
00:00:32.475 --> 00:00:39.886
Simplicity without specificity usually leads to broad statements that are in theory, easy to grasp, but in reality, don't say anything at all.
00:00:40.886 --> 00:00:46.706
The first place a lack of specificity manifest is in the slide and overview that describes the problem the startup is solving.
00:00:47.485 --> 00:00:52.795
Too often, the problem is framed at such a general high level it seems like the company is boiling the ocean.
00:00:53.155 --> 00:00:54.926
But we all know a startup has to focus.
00:00:54.956 --> 00:00:55.375
Right?
00:00:56.076 --> 00:01:02.975
If a founder is lucky, an investor can piece together the more specific problem being solved once the founder gets to the solution part of the pitch.
00:01:03.365 --> 00:01:04.355
But not always.
00:01:04.775 --> 00:01:09.516
Plus this violates the"don't make me think" rule, refer to episode 27 for more on this.
00:01:10.325 --> 00:01:16.656
If the problem is teed up, well, an investor should have a sense of the solution and the target customer based on the description of the problem.
00:01:17.406 --> 00:01:22.805
The framing of the problem is critical because it helps an investor conceptualize how deep the pain is for customers.
00:01:23.385 --> 00:01:29.445
Understanding the value proposition and why customers will ultimately buy the product is one of the most critical parts of the pitch.
00:01:29.986 --> 00:01:38.506
The more generic, the problem statement, the harder it is for investors to conceptualize the pain and the potential purchasers return on investment aka the ROI.
00:01:39.319 --> 00:01:44.569
The ROI is a second critical area requiring specificity rather than overgeneralization.
00:01:45.149 --> 00:01:47.819
What does the customer get in exchange for using the product?
00:01:48.118 --> 00:01:48.808
More time?
00:01:49.108 --> 00:01:49.679
More money?
00:01:50.159 --> 00:01:51.209
How has this quantified?
00:01:51.968 --> 00:01:56.368
In the early days, it can be hard to identify a specific amount of money or time being saved.
00:01:56.698 --> 00:02:02.602
But investors like to see that founders have a keen understanding of how their product is going to add tangible value to customers.
00:02:03.362 --> 00:02:10.758
When pitching for investment, the burden is on the founder to effectively communicate that the problem their company is solving is truly a hair-on-fire problem.
00:02:11.448 --> 00:02:16.877
Buyers have finite resources and will prioritize spending on only the most urgent onerous challenges.
00:02:17.657 --> 00:02:22.217
A founder has to be able to convey the severity of the problem and the specific upside for solving it.
00:02:22.758 --> 00:02:25.698
Without both, investors know customers just won't buy.