Welcome to our new website!
Feb. 29, 2024

190. A VC's Job Is NOT To Write Checks feat. Eric Marcoullier

190. A VC's Job Is NOT To Write Checks feat. Eric Marcoullier

Text your thoughts directly to Rich.

A VC's job is to say "no." Now knowing that, how do you adjust your approach?

About Eric Marcoullier
Eric coaches first- and second-time tech CEOs, keeping their companies alive long enough to get lucky, figure out their business, find product/market fit and replace his ass with someone who knows how to scale companies beyond $5M in ARR. His work primarily involves challenging business assumptions, providing frameworks for new situations and distilling complexity down to basic, actionable ideas. If you'd like to learn more about his coaching, visit www.marcoullier.com or www.linkedin.com/in/bpm140

About AVL Growth Partners
AVL Growth Partners, founded in 2009, is the leading fractional Finance and Accounting firm supporting organizations in pivoting from growth to scale. AVL brings an experienced team of CFOs, Controllers, and Accountants to your organization, delivering transparent, strategic actions for short and long-term success. Transform your financial approach affordably with AVL, supporting companies coast to coast - get to know AVL Growth Partners at avlgrowth.com. (Sponsored)

About SpringTime Ventures
SpringTime Ventures seeds high-growth startups in healthcare, fintech & insurtech, and logistics & supply chain. We look for founders with domain expertise, forging a path with a truly transformative technology. We only invest in software-based businesses in the USA. We bring a people-focused approach, work quickly, and reach conviction independently. Our initial check size is $600k. You can learn more about us and our approach.     

Transcript
WEBVTT

00:00:01.000 --> 00:00:05.389
A VCs primary job is not actually to make investments.

00:00:06.139 --> 00:00:07.280
Most people that hear that.

00:00:07.679 --> 00:00:09.759
immediately argue that their minds are blown.

00:00:10.099 --> 00:00:14.073
Of course their job is to write checks! That's what they set companies up to do.

00:00:14.442 --> 00:00:15.630
It's the way they get LPs.

00:00:15.640 --> 00:00:18.629
It's to write checks and invest in companies.

00:00:19.129 --> 00:00:25.646
But when you look at their day to day activity and what they do more than anything else, it is not writing checks.

00:00:26.396 --> 00:00:39.087
It's saying"no." And that's really important because pretty much every piece of advice you've got about your pitch deck has either come from a VC or an accelerator that is basically a VC.

00:00:40.087 --> 00:00:48.222
What they are optimizing for is as much information as possible in a deck that they can find a reason to say no.

00:00:48.972 --> 00:00:50.802
And it's not because they're heartless.

00:00:50.853 --> 00:00:53.773
It's not because they're cold and mean and whatever else.

00:00:54.243 --> 00:01:00.192
It's because the average investor will see 1000 decks for every 1 check that they write.

00:01:00.942 --> 00:01:05.722
They can't do 1000 meaningful due diligence processes in order to write one check?

00:01:05.832 --> 00:01:08.192
No way! They can maybe do 50.

00:01:08.692 --> 00:01:10.852
So what do they do with the other 950?

00:01:11.382 --> 00:01:14.507
They find a reason to say no that lets them sleep at night.

00:01:15.219 --> 00:01:17.472
"Oh, this founder doesn't have a technical co founder?

00:01:17.772 --> 00:01:18.692
All right, they're gone.

00:01:18.980 --> 00:01:20.540
Don't need to see the rest of the slide deck.

00:01:21.230 --> 00:01:24.969
This founder doesn't seem to have a large enough TAM?

00:01:25.319 --> 00:01:25.959
All right, they're gone.

00:01:26.510 --> 00:01:29.242
This founder says their TAM is ludicrously big.

00:01:29.802 --> 00:01:30.132
Nope.

00:01:30.272 --> 00:01:44.415
They're gone too." Any reason that you can say no and feel like that was a rational choice enables you as an investor to continue doing your job and weeding out companies because you can't test every single thesis.

00:01:44.456 --> 00:01:46.986
You can't validate every hypothesis.

00:01:46.986 --> 00:01:48.266
You can't talk to every founder.

00:01:49.394 --> 00:01:52.164
I'm actually a huge believer in, don't send a deck at all.

00:01:52.513 --> 00:01:57.774
Don't send a deck and give them any opportunities to say no based on the information.

00:01:58.274 --> 00:02:01.030
I recognize we live in a world where decks are important.

00:02:01.625 --> 00:02:06.152
But I do believe in a teaser deck that doesn't have necessarily 12 slides.

00:02:06.655 --> 00:02:08.316
Should have five slides or six slides.

00:02:08.634 --> 00:02:09.944
It obviously needs the team.

00:02:10.405 --> 00:02:15.405
And then all you need to do is paint a huge market opportunity.

00:02:16.405 --> 00:02:28.918
The phrase that I live by is"unexpected and inevitable." You're looking for some piece of information about the world that the investor didn't know That the investor, more than likely, can't know.

00:02:28.927 --> 00:02:32.467
Because if they do know how disruptive can that idea even be?

00:02:33.068 --> 00:02:40.793
You want to show up in front of an investor and say, here's this thing about the world that I'm uniquely and singularly aware of.

00:02:41.362 --> 00:02:46.992
And once the investor hears that information, everything else just follows.

00:02:47.669 --> 00:02:52.780
To the point that the absolute best possible reaction from a VC is,"wait a second, wait a second, wait a second.

00:02:53.039 --> 00:03:04.199
So what you're saying is because there's this change in the world, then this follows, then this follows, and there's a huge fucking market there." And the reaction is yeah, baby.

00:03:04.199 --> 00:03:07.050
Like that's the pitch you want to talk about how we're going to get there?

00:03:08.050 --> 00:03:25.639
That should be the fundamental component of a teaser deck is the team, that unexpected yet inevitable market opportunity, and then ideally some traction or whatever last little bit of information that you can give.

00:03:26.389 --> 00:03:29.650
The goal is not to give an investor a reason to say no.

00:03:29.669 --> 00:03:35.460
It's to give them a compelling idea that they simply cannot say no to before they have a conversation.